Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Mfg. Co.
231 F. 701, 145 C.C.A. 587, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1698
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Mfg. Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 235 F. 398 →
Opinion
We think the motion should be denied. A stay now would simply postpone the hearing of this appeal. It would not, or at least it may not, determine the complainant’s rights in this case, which is apparently a simple infringement suit based upon a patent owned by the complainant.
The defendants have set up the alleged license agreement, and if they claim under it they cannot attack it. The more orderly and safer way is to let the case proceed on its merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Mfg. Co., 231 F. 701, 145 C.C.A. 587, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1698 (2d Cir. 1916).
231 F. 701 (Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Mfg. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.