Motion Games, LLC v. Nintendo of America Inc.
This text of Motion Games, LLC v. Nintendo of America Inc. (Motion Games, LLC v. Nintendo of America Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
MOTION GAMES, LLC, Appellant
v.
NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC., Appellee ______________________
2015-1867 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014- 00164. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
DAVID MICHAEL UNDERHILL, Boies, Schiller & Flex- ner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by PATRICK M. LAFFERTY; JOSHUA M. KALB, Hunton & Williams LLP, Atlanta, GA.
RUDOLF EDWARD HUTZ, Reed Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRIAN D. ROCHE, Chicago, IL; BARRY JOHN COYNE, Pittsburgh, PA; JOSEPH PRESTA, Nixon & Vanderhye P.C., Arlington, VA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 10, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Motion Games, LLC v. Nintendo of America Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/motion-games-llc-v-nintendo-of-america-inc-cafc-2016.