Motion for Reargument

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Motion for Reargument

96 R.I. 511

DecidedNovember 22, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 96 R.I. 511 (Motion for Reargument) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Motion for Reargument, 96 R.I. 511 (R.I. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After our decision in the above case was filed, the petitioner by permission of the court presented a motion for leave to reargue. He contends therein that the court fias either overlooked or misconceived certain evidence as it relates to the possibility of the reconciliation of the parties. Upon consideration thereof we are of the opinion that such assertions as to the state of the record raise an issue of sufficient importance to warrant further arguments on the narrow issue of the possibility of a reconciliation in the circumstances stated.

As thus restricted motion for leave to reargue is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

After our decision in the above case was filed, the petitioner by permission of the court presented a motion for leave to reargue. He contends therein that the court fias either overlooked or misconceived certain evidence as it relates to the possibility of the reconciliation of the parties. Upon consideration thereof we are of the opinion that such assertions as to the state of the record raise an issue of sufficient importance to warrant further arguments on the narrow issue of the possibility of a reconciliation in the circumstances stated.

As thus restricted motion for leave to reargue is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 R.I. 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/motion-for-reargument-ri-1963.