Motichka v. MP 1291 Trust

136 A.D.3d 445, 23 N.Y.S.3d 892
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 4, 2016
Docket143N 160158/13
StatusPublished

This text of 136 A.D.3d 445 (Motichka v. MP 1291 Trust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Motichka v. MP 1291 Trust, 136 A.D.3d 445, 23 N.Y.S.3d 892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), entered January 17, 2014, which, after a hearing, denied plaintiff tenant’s motion for a preliminary injunction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion (see Doe v Axelrod, 73 NY2d 748, 750 [1988]), where the evidence raises “sharp” issues of fact regarding plaintiff’s noise and odor complaints, and the intent of the parties that drafted a 1999 stipulation (Residential Bd. of Mgrs. of Columbia Condominium v Alden, 178 AD2d 121, 123 [1st Dept 1991]; Lehey v Goldburt, 90 AD3d 410, 411 [1st Dept 2011]). Plaintiff has not made the required showing for a preliminary injunction (see Doe, 73 NY2d at 750).

Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny, Acosta and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lehey v. Goldburt
90 A.D.3d 410 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Residential Board of Managers of Columbia Condominium v. Alden
178 A.D.2d 121 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 A.D.3d 445, 23 N.Y.S.3d 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/motichka-v-mp-1291-trust-nyappdiv-2016.