Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Motes v. State

Motes v. State

765 So. 2d 75, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3549, 2000 WL 305144
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 27, 2000
DocketNo. 1D98-3207
StatusPublished

This text of 765 So. 2d 75 (Motes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Motes v. State, 765 So. 2d 75, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3549, 2000 WL 305144 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was sentenced as a prison re-leasee reoffender, and he has raised several arguments that the Prison Releasee Reoffender Punishment Act, section 775.082(8), Florida Statutes (1997), is unconstitutional. We have previously addressed each of these challenges and found them to be without merit. See Chambers v. State, 752 So.2d 64 (Flalst DCA 2000). However, we certify the same question previously certified in Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA), review granted, 740 So.2d 529 (Fla.1999).

AFFIRMED.

MINER, BENTON, and BROWNING, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chambers v. State
752 So. 2d 64 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Woods v. State
740 So. 2d 20 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
765 So. 2d 75, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3549, 2000 WL 305144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/motes-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.