Moten v. State
579 So. 2d 916, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5451, 1991 WL 90281
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 1991·No. No. 90-02406·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm the judgment and sentence in this case, including the departure from the sentence recommended by sentencing guidelines. See Williams v. State, 568 So.2d 1276 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). As in Williams, we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance:
DOES A SECOND VIOLATION OF PROBATION CONSTITUTE A VALID BASIS FOR A DEPARTURE SENTENCE BEYOND THE ONE-CELL DEPARTURE PROVIDED IN THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moten v. State, 579 So. 2d 916, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5451, 1991 WL 90281 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
579 So. 2d 916 (Moten v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moten v. State
594 So. 2d 289 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Maguire v. State
586 So. 2d 1268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)