Mote v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mote v. State

29 S.E.2d 661, 70 Ga. App. 822, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 113

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 19, 1944

Docket30368.

StatusPublished

This text of 29 S.E.2d 661 (Mote v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mote v. State, 29 S.E.2d 661, 70 Ga. App. 822, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 113 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Gardner, J.

The questions of law and fact in this case are almost identical with those in Day v. State, ante. The opinion in the latter case is controlling on all assignments of error in the instant case. Therefore the judge did not err in overruling the certiorari for any reason assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner, J.

The questions of law and fact in this case are almost identical with those in Day v. State, ante. The opinion in the latter case is controlling on all assignments of error in the instant case. Therefore the judge did not err in overruling the certiorari for any reason assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 S.E.2d 661, 70 Ga. App. 822, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mote-v-state-gactapp-1944.