Mote v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mote v. State

29 S.E.2d 661, 70 Ga. App. 822, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 113

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 19, 1944·No. 30368.·Published

Opinion

Gardner, J.

The questions of law and fact in this case are almost identical with those in Day v. State, ante. The opinion in the latter case is controlling on all assignments of error in the instant case. Therefore the judge did not err in overruling the certiorari for any reason assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner, J.

The questions of law and fact in this case are almost identical with those in Day v. State, ante. The opinion in the latter case is controlling on all assignments of error in the instant case. Therefore the judge did not err in overruling the certiorari for any reason assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Mote v. State, 29 S.E.2d 661, 70 Ga. App. 822, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 113 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

29 S.E.2d 661 (Mote v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.