Mota v. Mukasey

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mota v. Mukasey. Read the opinion of the Court — 543 F.3d 1165
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 8, 2008·No. 07-71880·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CONSTANTINA RAMIREZ MOTA,  Petitioner, No. 07-71880 v.  Agency No. A79-540-706 MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General of the United States, ORDER Respondent.  Filed December 8, 2008

Before: David R. Thompson and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges, and Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge.*

ORDER

The parties having advised this court that they have exhausted attempts to settle this case, and the court’s Circuit Mediator having advised the court that mediation proceedings have terminated, and the parties having requested that the mandate now issue,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the mandate in this case shall issue forthwith.

*The Honorable Barry T. Moskowitz, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

16065 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mota v. Mukasey, (9th Cir. 2008).

Mota v. Mukasey (Mota v. Mukasey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.