Mosten Management Co. v. Zurich-American Insurance Group

Ninth Circuit

Mosten Management Co. v. Zurich-American Insurance Group

37 F. App'x 942

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 20, 2002·No. No. 00-15406, 00-15510; D.C. No. CV-89-03475-CW/PJH·Published

Opinions

MEMORANDUM

*

The district court erred in awarding Mosten attorneys’ fees under Brandt v. [943]*943Superior Court, 37 Cal.3d 813, 210 Cal.Rptr. 211, 693 P.2d 796 (1985). Mosten initially brought both tort and contract claims against Zurich, but the district court granted Zurich summary judgment as to the latter claim; the only remaining claim was for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. However, Brandt fees may not be awarded for recovery on such claims. Burnaby v. Standard Fire Ins. Co., 40 Cal.App.4th 787, 47 Cal.Rptr.2d 326, 329 (Ct.App.1995); United Servs. Auto. Ass’n v. Dalrymple, 232 Cal.App.3d 182, 283 Cal.Rptr. 330, 332 (Ct.App.1991).

Because Mosten can’t satisfy the Brandt requirements for its trial fees, it can’t satisfy the same requirements for fees on appeal. The district court therefore did not err in denying Mosten’s application for appellate Brandt fees.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part. No costs.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts [943]*943of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM

*

The district court erred in awarding Mosten attorneys’ fees under Brandt v. [943]*943Superior Court, 37 Cal.3d 813, 210 Cal.Rptr. 211, 693 P.2d 796 (1985). Mosten initially brought both tort and contract claims against Zurich, but the district court granted Zurich summary judgment as to the latter claim; the only remaining claim was for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. However, Brandt fees may not be awarded for recovery on such claims. Burnaby v. Standard Fire Ins. Co., 40 Cal.App.4th 787, 47 Cal.Rptr.2d 326, 329 (Ct.App.1995); United Servs. Auto. Ass’n v. Dalrymple, 232 Cal.App.3d 182, 283 Cal.Rptr. 330, 332 (Ct.App.1991).

Because Mosten can’t satisfy the Brandt requirements for its trial fees, it can’t satisfy the same requirements for fees on appeal. The district court therefore did not err in denying Mosten’s application for appellate Brandt fees.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part. No costs.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts [943]*943of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Circuit Rule 36-3.

Mosten Management Co. v. Zurich-American Insurance Group, 37 F. App'x 942 (9th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

37 F. App'x 942 (Mosten Management Co. v. Zurich-American Insurance Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related