Mosteller v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mosteller v. Davis

107 S.E. 612, 27 Ga. App. 71, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 689

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 12, 1921

Docket12222

StatusPublished

This text of 107 S.E. 612 (Mosteller v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mosteller v. Davis, 107 S.E. 612, 27 Ga. App. 71, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 689 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The charge of the court was a very full, able, and fair presentation of the law of the case and the contentions of the parties, and none of the excerpts from the charge, excepted to, when considered in the light of the' evidence adduced and the charge as a whole, contains material error.

2. Upon the controlling issues of fact in the case, the evidence was in acute conflict, but those questions were settled by the jury in favor of the defendant; and their finding having been approved by the judge and authorized by the evidence, and no reversible error of law appearing, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. The charge of the court was a very full, able, and fair presentation of the law of the case and the contentions of the parties, and none of the excerpts from the charge, excepted to, when considered in the light of the' evidence adduced and the charge as a whole, contains material error.

2. Upon the controlling issues of fact in the case, the evidence was in acute conflict, but those questions were settled by the jury in favor of the defendant; and their finding having been approved by the judge and authorized by the evidence, and no reversible error of law appearing, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 S.E. 612, 27 Ga. App. 71, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mosteller-v-davis-gactapp-1921.