Most v. Walker
This text of 297 A.D.2d 356 (Most v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[357]*357Substantial compliance is acceptable as to details of form in a cover sheet to a designating petition. Here, the cover sheet as it related to Sam D. Walker substantially complied with the requirements of the Election Law and the regulations of the New York State Board of Elections (see Election Law § 6-134 [10]; 9 NYCRR 6215.6 [a]; see also Matter of Ardesia v Seidel, 242 AD2d 343; Matter of Fromson v Lefever, 112 AD2d 1064, 1065, affd sub nom. Matter of Barrett v Scaringe, 65 NY2d 946; Matter of Quintyne v Canary, 104 AD2d 473, 474). Santucci, J.P., Florio, O’Brien, Luciano and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
297 A.D.2d 356, 746 N.Y.2d 410, 746 N.Y.S.2d 410, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/most-v-walker-nyappdiv-2002.