Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Most v. Walker

Most v. Walker

297 A.D.2d 356, 746 N.Y.2d 410, 746 N.Y.S.2d 410, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8026
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 21, 2002·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

[357] Substantial compliance is acceptable as to details of form in a cover sheet to a designating petition. Here, the cover sheet as it related to Sam D. Walker substantially complied with the requirements of the Election Law and the regulations of the New York State Board of Elections (see Election Law § 6-134 [10]; 9 NYCRR 6215.6 [a]; see also Matter of Ardesia v Seidel, 242 AD2d 343; Matter of Fromson v Lefever, 112 AD2d 1064, 1065, affd sub nom. Matter of Barrett v Scaringe, 65 NY2d 946; Matter of Quintyne v Canary, 104 AD2d 473, 474). Santucci, J.P., Florio, O’Brien, Luciano and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Most v. Walker, 297 A.D.2d 356, 746 N.Y.2d 410, 746 N.Y.S.2d 410, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8026 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

297 A.D.2d 356 (Most v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hayon v. Greenfield
109 A.D.3d 920 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Balberg v. Board of Elections
109 A.D.3d 910 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Krance v. Chiaramonte
87 A.D.3d 669 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Magelaner v. Park
32 A.D.3d 487 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Pearse v. New York City Board of Elections
10 A.D.3d 461 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Siems v. Lite
307 A.D.2d 1016 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)