Most v. Stratman
This text of 32 F. App'x 431 (Most v. Stratman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Karl August Most III appeals pro se from the order terminating his Bivens action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order entered January 8, 2001.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 F. App'x 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/most-v-stratman-ca9-2002.