Most v. McArdle

Superior Court of New York

Most v. McArdle

36 N.Y.S. 1129

CourtThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

DecidedDecember 18, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 36 N.Y.S. 1129 (Most v. McArdle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Most v. McArdle, 36 N.Y.S. 1129 (superctny 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

GILDERSLEEVE, J.

This appeal is from a judgment rendered at special term, dismissing the complaint on the merits. The action was brought in equity for a rescission of a settlement of indebtedness owing by respondent to appellant upon the ground of fraud, alleged to have been perpetrated by the respondent in procuring the settlement. A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any errors of law. The conclusions of fact reached by the learned trial judge are fully supported by the evidence, and the judgment should not be disturbed. Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GILDERSLEEVE, J.

This appeal is from a judgment rendered at special term, dismissing the complaint on the merits. The action was brought in equity for a rescission of a settlement of indebtedness owing by respondent to appellant upon the ground of fraud, alleged to have been perpetrated by the respondent in procuring the settlement. A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any errors of law. The conclusions of fact reached by the learned trial judge are fully supported by the evidence, and the judgment should not be disturbed. Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 N.Y.S. 1129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/most-v-mcardle-superctny-1895.