Most v. McArdle

15 Misc. 687, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 906
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedDecember 15, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 15 Misc. 687 (Most v. McArdle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Most v. McArdle, 15 Misc. 687, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 906 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

Gildersleeve, J.

This appeal is from a judgment rendered at Special Term, dismissing the complaint on the merits. The action was brought in equity for a rescission of a settlement of indebtedness owing by respondent to appellant upon the [688]*688ground of fraud, alleged to have been perpetrated by the rOspondént in procuring the settlement.

A careful examination of the record fails to- disclose any errors of law. The conclusions of fact reached by the learned trial judge are fully supported by the evidence and the judgment should not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.

MoAdam, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Misc. 687, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/most-v-mcardle-nysuperctnyc-1895.