Most v. McArdle

The Superior Court of New York City

Most v. McArdle

15 Misc. 687, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 906

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided December 15, 1895·Published

Opinion

Gildersleeve, J.

This appeal is from a judgment rendered at Special Term, dismissing the complaint on the merits. The action was brought in equity for a rescission of a settlement of indebtedness owing by respondent to appellant upon the [688] ground of fraud, alleged to have been perpetrated by the rOspondént in procuring the settlement.

A careful examination of the record fails to- disclose any errors of law. The conclusions of fact reached by the learned trial judge are fully supported by the evidence and the judgment should not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.

MoAdam, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gildersleeve, J.

This appeal is from a judgment rendered at Special Term, dismissing the complaint on the merits. The action was brought in equity for a rescission of a settlement of indebtedness owing by respondent to appellant upon the [688] ground of fraud, alleged to have been perpetrated by the rOspondént in procuring the settlement.

A careful examination of the record fails to- disclose any errors of law. The conclusions of fact reached by the learned trial judge are fully supported by the evidence and the judgment should not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.

MoAdam, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs

Most v. McArdle, 15 Misc. 687, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 906 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

15 Misc. 687 (Most v. McArdle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.