Mossi v. Fuenzalida

422 So. 2d 971, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21644
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 16, 1982
DocketNo. 82-373
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 422 So. 2d 971 (Mossi v. Fuenzalida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mossi v. Fuenzalida, 422 So. 2d 971, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21644 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment for the defendants in a foreclosure action.

If the record contains any competent and substantial evidence which will support the trial judge’s conclusion, that conclusion will not be disturbed on appeal. Camacho Enterprises, Inc. v. Better Construction, Inc., 343 So.2d 1296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Peacock v. Carver, 315 So.2d 214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). If the trial court chose to believe the mortgagors’ testimony that they attempted to make a timely payment of interest on the mortgage but were thwarted by the mortgagee, then, applying equity principles, the court could have refused to foreclose the mortgage on an accelerated basis. Campbell v. Werner, 232 So.2d 252 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Renelt v. Kline
458 So. 2d 401 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Sabates Optical Services, Inc. v. Intercontinental Group, Inc.
451 So. 2d 929 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
422 So. 2d 971, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mossi-v-fuenzalida-fladistctapp-1982.