Mossburg v. Maryland
This text of 676 F. App'x 211 (Mossburg v. Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[212]*212Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Christopher Maddox Mossburg appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mossburg v. Maryland, No. 8:15-cv-01633-RWT, 2016 WL 3541237 (D. Md. June 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
676 F. App'x 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mossburg-v-maryland-ca4-2017.