Moss v. United States

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moss v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 257 F. App'x 633
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 5, 2007·No. 07-1379·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1379

DANIEL MOSS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (7:06-cv-00051-D)

Submitted: October 24, 2007 Decided: December 5, 2007

Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Moss, Appellant Pro Se. Lora M. Taylor, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Daniel Moss appeals the district court’s order accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting the

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Moss v. United States,

No. 7:06-cv-00051-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 2007). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moss v. United States, (4th Cir. 2007).

Moss v. United States (Moss v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.