Moss v. State

664 So. 2d 1061, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12541, 1995 WL 700225
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 29, 1995·No. No. 95-1183·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant Robert Moss from final judgments of convictions and sentences for attempted sexual battery and simple battery arising out of a domestic violence incident, based on an adverse jury verdict. We affirm based on a holding that the state has demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt that there is no reasonable possibility that the erroneous admission in evidence of the complainant’s written statement to the police contributed to the guilty verdict and thus the subject error was harmless. We reach this result because the written statement was very abbreviated in nature, as well as cumulative of a more detailed oral statement to the police made by the complainant which was properly admitted in evidence as an excited utterance. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moss v. State, 664 So. 2d 1061, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12541, 1995 WL 700225 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

664 So. 2d 1061 (Moss v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Conigliaro
811 A.2d 491 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2002)
Taylor v. State
789 So. 2d 523 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)