Moss v. State
This text of 140 Ala. 199 (Moss v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This record discloses no judgment of guilt, but only an entry of what seems to have been intended as a confessed judgment for the fine and costs following upon a mere verdict of guilt. Upon the authority of Thomason v. State, 70 Ala. 20, which was referred to approvingly in Wright v. State, 103 Ala. 95, it must be held that the entry does not constitute a final judgment such as will support an appeal, and following the course [201]*201adopted in Thomason’s case, tbe appeal will be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 Ala. 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moss-v-state-ala-1903.