Moss v. State
140 Ala. 199
Opinion
This record discloses no judgment of guilt, but only an entry of what seems to have been intended as a confessed judgment for the fine and costs following upon a mere verdict of guilt. Upon the authority of Thomason v. State, 70 Ala. 20, which was referred to approvingly in Wright v. State, 103 Ala. 95, it must be held that the entry does not constitute a final judgment such as will support an appeal, and following the course [201] adopted in Thomason’s case, tbe appeal will be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moss v. State, 140 Ala. 199 (Ala. 1903).
140 Ala. 199 (Moss v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. State
208 So. 2d 807 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1968)
Douglas v. State
163 So. 2d 477 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1963)
Simpson v. State
151 So. 2d 255 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1963)
Knight v. State
142 So. 2d 899 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1962)
Perry v. State
59 So. 230 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1912)