Moss v. Moyer

Ohio Supreme Court

Moss v. Moyer

822 N.E.2d 385, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1430

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 10, 2005·No. 2004-2106·Published

Opinion

On Petition to Contest Election. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a petition to contest an election under R.C. 3515.08. Upon review of the motion for leave of John Conyers, Jr., member of Congress, to file as amicus curiae in support of eontestors’ counsel, the motion for admission pro hac vice of Sampak P. Garg by Robert J. Fitrakis for amicus curiae U.S. Rep. John Conyers, Jr., and the request for recusal filed by attorney Clifford 0. Arnebeck,

[1431] IT IS ORDERED that the motions for leave and for admission pro hac vice are granted and that amicus curiae John Conyers, Jr., may file a memorandum in response to the motion for sanctions ■within 10 days of the date of this entry.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request for recusal is denied.

O’Connor, J., in Chambers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Petition to Contest Election. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a petition to contest an election under R.C. 3515.08. Upon review of the motion for leave of John Conyers, Jr., member of Congress, to file as amicus curiae in support of eontestors’ counsel, the motion for admission pro hac vice of Sampak P. Garg by Robert J. Fitrakis for amicus curiae U.S. Rep. John Conyers, Jr., and the request for recusal filed by attorney Clifford 0. Arnebeck,

[1431] IT IS ORDERED that the motions for leave and for admission pro hac vice are granted and that amicus curiae John Conyers, Jr., may file a memorandum in response to the motion for sanctions ■within 10 days of the date of this entry.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request for recusal is denied.

O’Connor, J., in Chambers.

Moss v. Moyer, 822 N.E.2d 385, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1430 (Ohio 2005).

Pincite

822 N.E.2d 385 (Moss v. Moyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.