Moss v. Moss

Supreme Court of Georgia

Moss v. Moss

82 S.E. 136, 141 Ga. 769, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 138

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 10, 1914

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 82 S.E. 136 (Moss v. Moss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moss v. Moss, 82 S.E. 136, 141 Ga. 769, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 138 (Ga. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Beck, J.

It appearing, from the recitals in the bill of exceptions and from the record in this case, that the question as to whether the court properly granted an injunction at the interlocutory hearing depends upon a consideration of the evidence introduced at the hearing, and it further appearing that the evidence is neither set forth literally or in substance in the bill of exceptions nor" attached thereto as an exhibit, and that there is no brief of the evidence approved by the trial judge and made [770]*770a part of the record, this court can not say that the’ court below erred ' idn granting the interlocutory injunction.

June 10, 1914.

Injunction. Before Judge Wright. Floyd superior court. November 5, 1913.

Henry IFalicer, for plaintiff in error. McHenry & Porter, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, J.

It appearing, from the recitals in the bill of exceptions and from the record in this case, that the question as to whether the court properly granted an injunction at the interlocutory hearing depends upon a consideration of the evidence introduced at the hearing, and it further appearing that the evidence is neither set forth literally or in substance in the bill of exceptions nor" attached thereto as an exhibit, and that there is no brief of the evidence approved by the trial judge and made [770]*770a part of the record, this court can not say that the’ court below erred ' idn granting the interlocutory injunction.

June 10, 1914.

Injunction. Before Judge Wright. Floyd superior court. November 5, 1913.

Henry IFalicer, for plaintiff in error. McHenry & Porter, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 S.E. 136, 141 Ga. 769, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moss-v-moss-ga-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack