Moss v. Manhattan Railway Co.

Superior Court of New York

Moss v. Manhattan Railway Co.

21 N.Y.S. 1134

CourtThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

DecidedJanuary 3, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 21 N.Y.S. 1134 (Moss v. Manhattan Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moss v. Manhattan Railway Co., 21 N.Y.S. 1134 (superctny 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

GILDERSLEEVE, J.

The judgment enjoins and restrains the maintenance and operation of defendants’ elevated railroad in front of premises No. 371 Pearl street, unless they pay to plaintiffs the sum.of $3,000; and it also awards to plaintiffs $1,822.84, damages and costs. The action seems to have been carefully tried. No exceptions were taken to the admission or rejection of evidence, and a fair preponderance of evidence sustains the findings of the court below, and justifies the judgment. It follows that the judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GILDERSLEEVE, J.

The judgment enjoins and restrains the maintenance and operation of defendants’ elevated railroad in front of premises No. 371 Pearl street, unless they pay to plaintiffs the sum.of $3,000; and it also awards to plaintiffs $1,822.84, damages and costs. The action seems to have been carefully tried. No exceptions were taken to the admission or rejection of evidence, and a fair preponderance of evidence sustains the findings of the court below, and justifies the judgment. It follows that the judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 N.Y.S. 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moss-v-manhattan-railway-co-superctny-1893.