Moss v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Georgia

Moss v. Edwards

92 S.E. 213, 146 Ga. 686, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 443

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 11, 1917

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 92 S.E. 213 (Moss v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moss v. Edwards, 92 S.E. 213, 146 Ga. 686, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 443 (Ga. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Where a petition alleged that the father of the plaintiffs had been induced by fraud and intimidation to convey real estate and to transfer promissory notes to a son-in-law, thereby committing a wrong and an injury to the plaintiffs and their brothers and sisters, and against the father himself, the father still being in life, and prayed that the deed and the transfer of the notes be declared void, that the defendants be enjoined from cutting and sawing timber and making improvements on the land, that the defendants be enjoined from collecting said notes, and that a receiver for the property be appointed, it was not error to sustain a general demurrer to the petition. The sons had no such interest in the property of the father as would support the action. Pidcock v. Reid, 145 Ga. 103 (88 S. E. 564).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

Where a petition alleged that the father of the plaintiffs had been induced by fraud and intimidation to convey real estate and to transfer promissory notes to a son-in-law, thereby committing a wrong and an injury to the plaintiffs and their brothers and sisters, and against the father himself, the father still being in life, and prayed that the deed and the transfer of the notes be declared void, that the defendants be enjoined from cutting and sawing timber and making improvements on the land, that the defendants be enjoined from collecting said notes, and that a receiver for the property be appointed, it was not error to sustain a general demurrer to the petition. The sons had no such interest in the property of the father as would support the action. Pidcock v. Reid, 145 Ga. 103 (88 S. E. 564).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 S.E. 213, 146 Ga. 686, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moss-v-edwards-ga-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack