Moss v. Dunn & McCarthy, Inc.

244 A.D. 873

This text of 244 A.D. 873 (Moss v. Dunn & McCarthy, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moss v. Dunn & McCarthy, Inc., 244 A.D. 873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

The Broome County Court has reversed a judgment rendered by the City Court of Binghamton, in favor of a surgeon for services rendered to a person who had been employed for twelve years by the defendant, and who, five days prior to the operation in question, had been laid off temporarily. The evidence will sustain a finding that the plaintiff called the surgeon, who was clothed with apparent authority to bind defendant for medical services rendered to employees of the defendant, and that the surgeon, with authority to act for the defendant, authorized the operation to be performed at the expense of defendant. Judgment of the County Court reversed on the law, and judgment of the City Court of Binghamton reinstated, with costs. Hill, P. J., McNamee and Heffeman, JJ., concur; Rhodes and Crapser, JJ., dissent, and vote to affirm on the authority of Edwards v. Dooley (120 N. Y. 540) and Figueira v. Lerner (52 App. Div. 216).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edwards v. . Dooley
24 N.E. 827 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Figueira v. Lerner
52 A.D. 216 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 A.D. 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moss-v-dunn-mccarthy-inc-nyappdiv-1935.