Moss v. Comfort Inn Woodland Hills
275 F. App'x 717
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
The district court’s finding that Moss did not have an intent to return to the Woodland Hills Comfort Inn on the date the lawsuit was filed is supported by substantial evidence in the record. The district court’s conclusion that Moss lacked standing is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moss v. Comfort Inn Woodland Hills, 275 F. App'x 717 (9th Cir. 2008).
275 F. App'x 717 (Moss v. Comfort Inn Woodland Hills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.