Moss v. Comfort Inn Woodland Hills
This text of 275 F. App'x 717 (Moss v. Comfort Inn Woodland Hills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
The district court’s finding that Moss did not have an intent to return to the Woodland Hills Comfort Inn on the date the lawsuit was filed is supported by substantial evidence in the record. The district court’s conclusion that Moss lacked standing is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 F. App'x 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moss-v-comfort-inn-woodland-hills-ca9-2008.