Moss-Marlow Building Co. v. Jones

41 S.E.2d 742, 227 N.C. 282, 1947 N.C. LEXIS 385
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 26, 1947·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An application for a bill of particulars under G. S., 1-150, formerly C. S., 534, “is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and his ruling thereon, made in the exercise of such discretion, is not reviewable on appeal, except perhaps in extreme cases.” Tickle v. Hobgood, 212 N. C., 762, 194 S. E., 461. "While appellants concede this principle of law, they contend that this ease comes within the exception. However, the argument advanced, in the light of the allegations in the complaint and the exhibit attached thereto, fails in persuasiveness. Hence, the ruling of the court below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moss-Marlow Building Co. v. Jones, 41 S.E.2d 742, 227 N.C. 282, 1947 N.C. LEXIS 385 (N.C. 1947).

41 S.E.2d 742 (Moss-Marlow Building Co. v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jones
445 S.E.2d 23 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1994)
Tillis v. Calvine Cotton Mills, Inc.
73 S.E.2d 296 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
Lowman v. City of Asheville
49 S.E.2d 408 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)