Moss Estate, Inc. v. Town of Ossining

243 A.D. 633
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Upon the agreed statements of facts, judgment is unanimously directed for the defendant, dismissing plaintiff’s claim for the recovery of a certain tax paid by it under protest, without costs. In our opinion, the inclusion by the town board of the town of Ossining of the certificates of indebtedness, issued against uncollected taxes, was authorized by section 112 of the Town Law, subdivision 2, paragraph (b), and the statutes involved in this controversy are constitutional. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moss Estate, Inc. v. Town of Ossining, 243 A.D. 633 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

243 A.D. 633 (Moss Estate, Inc. v. Town of Ossining) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Town of Irondequoit v. County of Monroe
158 Misc. 123 (New York Supreme Court, 1935)