Moss & Co. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Moss & Co. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.

75 S.E. 816, 11 Ga. App. 482, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 65

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 24, 1912

Docket3591

StatusPublished

This text of 75 S.E. 816 (Moss & Co. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moss & Co. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co., 75 S.E. 816, 11 Ga. App. 482, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 65 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, J.

In view of the decision of this court when the case was first before it (Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Moss, 5 Ga. App. 503, 63 S. E. 590), the trial judge did not err in directing a verdict for the defendant. The amendment offered on the second trial did not materially . affect any feature of the case, and this case is fully within the principle of res judicata.

Judgment affirmed.

Pottle, J., not presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

In view of the decision of this court when the case was first before it (Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Moss, 5 Ga. App. 503, 63 S. E. 590), the trial judge did not err in directing a verdict for the defendant. The amendment offered on the second trial did not materially . affect any feature of the case, and this case is fully within the principle of res judicata.

Judgment affirmed.

Pottle, J., not presiding.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 S.E. 816, 11 Ga. App. 482, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moss-co-v-postal-telegraph-cable-co-gactapp-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack