Mosness v. Lacy
This text of 76 N.W. 34 (Mosness v. Lacy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action to set aside the record of a foreclosure sale by advertisement, and the question involved is the validity of the postponement of the sale from the time fixed in the original advertisement, viz., August 10, 1895, to August 24, 1895.
The record does not show that the sale was not duly postponed. The sale itself was made by the sheriff in the manner provided by [285]*285statute, and the certificate thereof contained the requirements of the law. As this certificate, under G-. S. 1894, § 6054, is prima facie evidence that all the requirements of law in that behalf were duly complied with, the postponement and sale must be deemed valid.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 N.W. 34, 73 Minn. 283, 1898 Minn. LEXIS 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mosness-v-lacy-minn-1898.