Mosner v. Haddock
268 A.D. 752, 48 N.Y.S.2d 802, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3234
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 2, 1944·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley; [753] Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Untermyer, J., concurs on the ground that prohibition is not the proper remedy since the determination of the City Magistrate can be adequately reviewed by appeal. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1285; People ex rel. Livingston v. Wyatt, 186 N. Y. 383.) [181 Misc. 486.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mosner v. Haddock, 268 A.D. 752, 48 N.Y.S.2d 802, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3234 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).
268 A.D. 752 (Mosner v. Haddock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Consolidated Edison Co. v. Murtagh
201 Misc. 244 (New York Supreme Court, 1951)
People v. Newhauser
197 Misc. 54 (New York City Magistrates' Court, 1949)