Mosner v. Haddock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mosner v. Haddock

268 A.D. 752, 48 N.Y.S.2d 802, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3234

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 1944

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 268 A.D. 752 (Mosner v. Haddock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mosner v. Haddock, 268 A.D. 752, 48 N.Y.S.2d 802, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3234 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley; [753]*753Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Untermyer, J., concurs on the ground that prohibition is not the proper remedy since the determination of the City Magistrate can be adequately reviewed by appeal. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1285; People ex rel. Livingston v. Wyatt, 186 N. Y. 383.) [181 Misc. 486.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley; [753]*753Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Untermyer, J., concurs on the ground that prohibition is not the proper remedy since the determination of the City Magistrate can be adequately reviewed by appeal. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1285; People ex rel. Livingston v. Wyatt, 186 N. Y. 383.) [181 Misc. 486.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D. 752, 48 N.Y.S.2d 802, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mosner-v-haddock-nyappdiv-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack