Mosley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mosley v. State

492 S.W.3d 222, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 643, 2016 WL 3661814

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 28, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103263

StatusPublished

This text of 492 S.W.3d 222 (Mosley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mosley v. State, 492 S.W.3d 222, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 643, 2016 WL 3661814 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Mosley appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

[223]*223No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Mosley appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

[223]*223No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

492 S.W.3d 222, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 643, 2016 WL 3661814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mosley-v-state-moctapp-2016.