Mosley v. State

65 So. 124, 107 Miss. 158
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1914·Published

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Since the state’s witnesses did not definitely locate the •date of the alleged sale, and since both of them testified that they only obtained whisky from appellant once, the •court should have permitted the testimony of Arthur 'Cooper and Ed Henry to go to the jury.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mosley v. State, 65 So. 124, 107 Miss. 158 (Mich. 1914).

65 So. 124 (Mosley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.