Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Mosley v. State

Mosley v. State

92 S.E.2d 860, 212 Ga. 356, 1956 Ga. LEXIS 368
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 14, 1956
Docket19289
StatusPublished

This text of 92 S.E.2d 860 (Mosley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mosley v. State, 92 S.E.2d 860, 212 Ga. 356, 1956 Ga. LEXIS 368 (Ga. 1956).

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

The State's evidence contradicts the alleged newly discovered evidence which is the basis of the extraordinary motion for a new trial. The decision of the trial judge on this issue of fact will not be disturbed. McCoy v. State, 193 Ga. 413 (18 S. E. 2d 684); Ballard v. Harmon, 202 Ga. 603 (44 S. E. 2d 260); Parks v. State, 204 Ga. 41 (48 S. E. 2d 837). Nor is there any merit in the complaints about disallowing oral testimony and excluding a transcript of testimony given in some other hearing by witnesses whose affidavits were introduced upon this hearing. The judgment denying the motion for new trial is

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ballard v. Harmon
44 S.E.2d 260 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
McCoy v. State
18 S.E.2d 684 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Parks v. State
48 S.E.2d 837 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 S.E.2d 860, 212 Ga. 356, 1956 Ga. LEXIS 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mosley-v-state-ga-1956.