Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Mosley v. State

Mosley v. State

46 So. 3d 624, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15579, 2010 WL 4025876
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mosley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 528 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 15, 2010·No. No. 1D09-2313·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence. However, our review of the record revealed a scrivener’s error in the written judgment and sentence. Inadvertently, despite the fact that the trial court orally pronounced the sentence as a habitual felony offender sentence, the trial court failed to. check the habitual felony offender designation on the written judgment and sentence. Accordingly, we remand with directions to the trial court to correct this scrivener’s error.

HAWKES, C.J., ROBERTS and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mosley v. State, 46 So. 3d 624, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15579, 2010 WL 4025876 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

46 So. 3d 624 (Mosley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.