Mosley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mosley v. State

794 So. 2d 729, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13343, 2001 WL 1093096

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mosley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 739 So. 2d 672 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 19, 2001·No. No. 3D01-1058·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We initially reversed the summary denial of Sylvester Mosley’s Motion for Post-Conviction Relief pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850, because the State had been unable to provide us with a transcript of Mosley’s plea colloquy. The State has now filed the transcript, which affirmatively refutes Mosley’s allegations.

We therefore grant rehearing, affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion, and withdraw our previous opinion rendered August 29, 2001.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We initially reversed the summary denial of Sylvester Mosley’s Motion for Post-Conviction Relief pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850, because the State had been unable to provide us with a transcript of Mosley’s plea colloquy. The State has now filed the transcript, which affirmatively refutes Mosley’s allegations.

We therefore grant rehearing, affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion, and withdraw our previous opinion rendered August 29, 2001.

Mosley v. State, 794 So. 2d 729, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13343, 2001 WL 1093096 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

794 So. 2d 729 (Mosley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.