Mosley v. State
This text of 492 So. 2d 1071 (Mosley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a petition to review Mosley v. State, 482 So.2d 530 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), in which the district court affirmed Mosley’s sentence and certified the following question as being of great public importance:
Harris v. State, 438 So.2d 787 (Fla.1983), recognizes a constitutional right of an accused in a capital case to have the jury [1072]*1072instructed as to necessarily lesser included offenses and that the violation of that right constitutes fundamental error, a waiver of which, to be effective, must be made on the record knowingly and intelligently by the accused personally rather than by counsel. Do those charged with non-capital crimes enjoy this constitutional right as well as those charged with capital crimes?
482 So.2d at 533. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
In Jones v. State, 484 So.2d 577 (Fla.1986), we answered the certified question in the negative. Accordingly, we approve the decision of the district court in this cause.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
492 So. 2d 1071, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 435, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mosley-v-state-fla-1986.