Mosley v. Mosley
124 So. 2d 314
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mosley v. Mosley. Read the opinion of the Court — 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3695 →
Opinion
We have reviewed the record in the light of the arguments as to each point presented and hold that error has not been demonstrated. Pross v. Pross, Fla.1954, 72 So.2d 671; Glassman v. Deauville Enterprises, Inc., Fla.App.1958, 99 So.2d 641.
Our disposition of this appeal is not to be construed as affecting in any manner the right of the parties to litigate any matters, including property rights, not settled by the final decree appealed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mosley v. Mosley, 124 So. 2d 314 (Fla. Ct. App. 1960).
124 So. 2d 314 (Mosley v. Mosley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pross v. Pross
72 So. 2d 671 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
Glassman v. Deauville Enterprises, Inc.
99 So. 2d 641 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)