Mosley v. Flavius

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mosley v. Flavius

13 A.D.3d 346, 785 N.Y.S.2d 742, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14922

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 6, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 13 A.D.3d 346 (Mosley v. Flavius) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mosley v. Flavius, 13 A.D.3d 346, 785 N.Y.S.2d 742, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruditzky, J.), dated May 4, 2004, as, in effect, granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Elgar Flavius which was to strike the action from the trial calendar to the extent of directing the plaintiff to ap - pear for an independent medical examination within 60 days.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the motion of the defendant Elgar Flavius which was to strike the action from the trial calendar to the extent of directing the plaintiff to appear for an independent medical examination within 60 days. As Flavius’s motion was timely, he was only required to demonstrate that the action was not ready for trial (see 22 NYCRR 202.21 [e]; Rizzo v DeSimone, 287 AD2d 609, 610 [2001]; Perla v Wilson, 287 AD2d 606 [2001]; Audiovox Corp. v Benyamini, 265 AD2d 135, 139-140 [2000]). Krausman, J.P., Luciano, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruditzky, J.), dated May 4, 2004, as, in effect, granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Elgar Flavius which was to strike the action from the trial calendar to the extent of directing the plaintiff to ap - pear for an independent medical examination within 60 days.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the motion of the defendant Elgar Flavius which was to strike the action from the trial calendar to the extent of directing the plaintiff to appear for an independent medical examination within 60 days. As Flavius’s motion was timely, he was only required to demonstrate that the action was not ready for trial (see 22 NYCRR 202.21 [e]; Rizzo v DeSimone, 287 AD2d 609, 610 [2001]; Perla v Wilson, 287 AD2d 606 [2001]; Audiovox Corp. v Benyamini, 265 AD2d 135, 139-140 [2000]). Krausman, J.P., Luciano, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.3d 346, 785 N.Y.S.2d 742, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mosley-v-flavius-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack