Mosley v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Dept. of Labor

Fourth Circuit

Mosley v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Dept. of Labor

37 F.3d 1494, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34838, 1994 WL 545119

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 6, 1994

Docket94-1129

StatusPublished

This text of 37 F.3d 1494 (Mosley v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Dept. of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mosley v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Dept. of Labor, 37 F.3d 1494, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34838, 1994 WL 545119 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

37 F.3d 1494
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Lillie P. MOSLEY, as personal representative of the Estate
of Robert L. Mosley, Petitioner,
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, United
States Department of Labor, Respondent.

No. 94-1129.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 14, 1994
Decided: October 6, 1994.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (92-1614-BLA)

Lillie P. Mosley, Petitioner Pro Se.

Patricia May Nece, Sarah Marie Hurley, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1993). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Mosley v.Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, No. 92-1614-BLA (B.R.B. Dec. 29, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

37 F.3d 1494
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Lillie P. MOSLEY, as personal representative of the Estate
of Robert L. Mosley, Petitioner,
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, United
States Department of Labor, Respondent.

No. 94-1129.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 14, 1994
Decided: October 6, 1994.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (92-1614-BLA)

Lillie P. Mosley, Petitioner Pro Se.

Patricia May Nece, Sarah Marie Hurley, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1993). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Mosley v.Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, No. 92-1614-BLA (B.R.B. Dec. 29, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 F.3d 1494, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34838, 1994 WL 545119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mosley-v-director-office-of-workers-compensation-programs-us-dept-of-ca4-1994.