Moskwa v. Nassikas
This text of 133 A. 321 (Moskwa v. Nassikas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There can be no recovery for the purchase price of goods which the vendor could not legally sell. Albertson v. Shenton, 78 N. H. 216; Dunbar v. Locke, 62 N. H. 442; Bliss v. Brainard, 41 N. H. 256; Lewis v. Welch, 14 N. H. 294; Roby v. West, 4 N. H. 285. Adulterated milk could not legally be sold. Laws 1917, c. 156, s. 1.
*560 At least two cans of the milk sold by the plaintiff to the defendants, i. e., those from which the samples were taken, were watered. For the price of these two cans, amounting to one dollar, there can be no recovery. A verdict for the plaintiff for the balance of his claim would be sustainable upon the reported facts.
Case discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 A. 321, 82 N.H. 559, 1926 N.H. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moskwa-v-nassikas-nh-1926.