Moskowitz v. Miller

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Moskowitz v. Miller

1923 OK 703, 218 P. 794, 92 Okla. 193, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 824

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 25, 1923

Docket11762

StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK 703 (Moskowitz v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moskowitz v. Miller, 1923 OK 703, 218 P. 794, 92 Okla. 193, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 824 (Okla. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

This cause is for hearing on the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the appeal herein because no brief has been filed by the plaintiff in error, under the rules of this court, and for judgment on the supersedeas bond, certified copy of which is attached to said motion. On April 24, 1923, it was duly ordered that plaintiff in error file brief on or before July 1, 1923. Thereafter, on the 3rd day of July, 1923, an extension of 20 days was by this court allowed in which to file such brief. *194 Plaintiffs in error have wholly failed to do so, and no excuse offered.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged by this court that Olga Miller, defendant in error, have and recover of and from Harry Moskowitz and Ben Moskowitz, principals, and Abe Smith and John Moskowitz, sureties on said supersedeas bond, the sum of $400, with interest at the rate of six per cent, from the 19th day of March, 1920, and all costs of this action, for which let execution issue.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

This cause is for hearing on the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the appeal herein because no brief has been filed by the plaintiff in error, under the rules of this court, and for judgment on the supersedeas bond, certified copy of which is attached to said motion. On April 24, 1923, it was duly ordered that plaintiff in error file brief on or before July 1, 1923. Thereafter, on the 3rd day of July, 1923, an extension of 20 days was by this court allowed in which to file such brief. *194 Plaintiffs in error have wholly failed to do so, and no excuse offered.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged by this court that Olga Miller, defendant in error, have and recover of and from Harry Moskowitz and Ben Moskowitz, principals, and Abe Smith and John Moskowitz, sureties on said supersedeas bond, the sum of $400, with interest at the rate of six per cent, from the 19th day of March, 1920, and all costs of this action, for which let execution issue.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK 703, 218 P. 794, 92 Okla. 193, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moskowitz-v-miller-okla-1923.