Moskowitz v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moskowitz v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

100 A.D.2d 810, 474 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17916

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 24, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 100 A.D.2d 810 (Moskowitz v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moskowitz v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 100 A.D.2d 810, 474 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinions

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John G. Dier, J.), entered on January 6,1983, is modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reversing the judgment in favor of plaintiff and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages awarded to the plaintiff and otherwise affirmed, without costs, unless said plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict as to the total amount of plaintiff’s damages to $5,000,000, said amount to be decreased by the 32% attributable to plaintiff’s negligence and apportioned among the defendants, all as found by the jury, and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment as so amended and reduced is affirmed, without costs. K After review of the record, we find the judgment to have been excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross and Silverman, JJ. Alexander and Fein, JJ., dissent, each in a separate memorandum, as follows:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John G. Dier, J.), entered on January 6,1983, is modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reversing the judgment in favor of plaintiff and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages awarded to the plaintiff and otherwise affirmed, without costs, unless said plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict as to the total amount of plaintiff’s damages to $5,000,000, said amount to be decreased by the 32% attributable to plaintiff’s negligence and apportioned among the defendants, all as found by the jury, and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment as so amended and reduced is affirmed, without costs. K After review of the record, we find the judgment to have been excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross and Silverman, JJ. Alexander and Fein, JJ., dissent, each in a separate memorandum, as follows:

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A.D.2d 810, 474 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moskowitz-v-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack