Moskowitz v. General Accident Insurance
This text of 179 A.D.2d 722 (Moskowitz v. General Accident Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court properly granted the defendant Krieger’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) insofar as it is asserted against him. The conclusory allegations submitted in support of the plaintiffs’ assertions of economic duress and overreaching were not supported by evidentiary facts sufficient to present a triable issue regarding the validity [723]*723of the release (see, Ermco Erectors v Grand Iron Works, 93 AD2d 878, affd 60 NY2d 634). Kunzeman, J. P., Balletta, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
179 A.D.2d 722, 579 N.Y.S.2d 596, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moskowitz-v-general-accident-insurance-nyappdiv-1992.