Moskowitz v. Feuer
This text of 265 A.D. 884 (Moskowitz v. Feuer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the light of the admitted sale of the mill, apparently, although not expressly stated, to Continental Grain Company, there does not seem to have been even a showing of breach of contract. The inference created is that the sale terminated the lease of the mill by Continental Grain Company and, thereupon, the employment contracts, based upon that lease, were also terminated. In any event, on the facts as alleged, as distinguished from sheer conclusions, no cause of action is set forth to hold liable the defendant for the breach by Continental Grain Company, of which he was an officer and a director. (Greyhound Corp. v. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co., 259 App. Div. 317; Lukach v. Blair, 108 Misc. Rep. 20; affd., 192 App. Div. 957; Hicks v. Haight, 171 Misc. Rep. 151.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
265 A.D. 884, 38 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moskowitz-v-feuer-nyappdiv-1942.