Moskatel's, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Moskatel's, Inc. v. United States

62 Cust. Ct. 1076, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3358

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 25, 1969

DocketNo. P69/81; protests 67/83103, etc. (Los Angeles); No. P69/82; protests 68/18488-6704, etc. (Chicago)

StatusPublished

This text of 62 Cust. Ct. 1076 (Moskatel's, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moskatel's, Inc. v. United States, 62 Cust. Ct. 1076, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3358 (cusc 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Watson, J.

In accordance witli stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers, trees, foliage, fruits, vegetables, grasses, or grains, and articles made of the foregoing, in chief value of plastic, assembled in the same maimer as the merchandise the subject of Armbee Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and Zunold Trading Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson, J.

In accordance witli stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers, trees, foliage, fruits, vegetables, grasses, or grains, and articles made of the foregoing, in chief value of plastic, assembled in the same maimer as the merchandise the subject of Armbee Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and Zunold Trading Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 Cust. Ct. 1076, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moskatels-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack