Mosier v. Smith

3 Blackf. 132, 1832 Ind. LEXIS 41
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 29, 1832·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Blackford, J.

Smith brought an action of disseisin against Mosier. The declaration avers that the plaintiff below, on the 13th of October, 1830, purchased at the land office in Cravsfordsville, a certain quarter section of land, and received a certificate for the same, signed by the receiver of the land office. It also avers that the defendant, previously tó the plaintiff’s purchase, had entered into possession of a part of the premises, without any right, and still continued in possession. There is a plea of not guilty, and judgment for the plaintiff

This judgment must be reversed. The declaration contains no caúse of action. To sustain an action of disseisin, the plaintiff is bound, as in ejectment, to show a legal title. A land office certificate conveys no legal title

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mosier v. Smith, 3 Blackf. 132, 1832 Ind. LEXIS 41 (Ind. 1832).

3 Blackf. 132 (Mosier v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bethuram v. Black
74 Ky. 628 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1876)
Reed v. Hamilton
18 Ind. 476 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1862)
Dickerson v. Nelson
4 Ind. 160 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1853)
Smith v. Mosier
5 Blackf. 51 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1838)