Mosiello v. Baumblatt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mosiello v. Baumblatt

130 A.D.2d 468, 514 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46438

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 4, 1987·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for libel and the intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Isseks, J.), entered December 6, 1985, which granted the motion of the defendant John Perone for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as barred by the Statute of Limitations.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant Perone’s motion for summary judgment was properly granted (see, Harris v Alcan Aluminum Corp., 91 AD2d 830, affd 58 NY2d 1036; Citibank v Furlong, 81 AD2d 803). Mollen, P. J., Brown, Weinstein, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for libel and the intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Isseks, J.), entered December 6, 1985, which granted the motion of the defendant John Perone for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as barred by the Statute of Limitations.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant Perone’s motion for summary judgment was properly granted (see, Harris v Alcan Aluminum Corp., 91 AD2d 830, affd 58 NY2d 1036; Citibank v Furlong, 81 AD2d 803). Mollen, P. J., Brown, Weinstein, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Mosiello v. Baumblatt, 130 A.D.2d 468, 514 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46438 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

130 A.D.2d 468 (Mosiello v. Baumblatt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related