Mosher v. Snyder & Swanson, Inc.

8 F.R.D. 100, 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3215
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania·Decided March 25, 1948·No. Civil Action No. 6834·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

GIBSON, District Judge.

In its answer defendant pleaded certain matter in avoidance of the contract upon which plaintiff based his claim. It thereupon moved the court, pursuant to Rule 8 (c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to order plaintiff to reply to the affirmative defense set forth in the answer. In turn counsel for plaintiff moved to strike from the answer the affirmative defense, alleging that it was redundant and immaterial.

The motion of the plaintiff to strike from the answer the affirmative defense set forth therein having come on to be heard, upon consideration thereof it is ordered and adjudged that said motion to strike be, and the same hereby is, denied; and it is further ordered that plaintiff answer said affirmative defense on or before fifteen (15) days from the date hereof.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mosher v. Snyder & Swanson, Inc., 8 F.R.D. 100, 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3215 (W.D. Pa. 1948).

8 F.R.D. 100 (Mosher v. Snyder & Swanson, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moviecolor Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co.
24 F.R.D. 325 (S.D. New York, 1959)