Mosher v. Snyder & Swanson, Inc.

8 F.R.D. 100, 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3215
CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 25, 1948
DocketCivil Action No. 6834
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 F.R.D. 100 (Mosher v. Snyder & Swanson, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mosher v. Snyder & Swanson, Inc., 8 F.R.D. 100, 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3215 (W.D. Pa. 1948).

Opinion

GIBSON, District Judge.

In its answer defendant pleaded certain matter in avoidance of the contract upon which plaintiff based his claim. It thereupon moved the court, pursuant to Rule 8 (c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to order plaintiff to reply to the affirmative defense set forth in the answer. In turn counsel for plaintiff moved to strike from the answer the affirmative defense, alleging that it was redundant and immaterial.

The motion of the plaintiff to strike from the answer the affirmative defense set forth therein having come on to be heard, upon consideration thereof it is ordered and adjudged that said motion to strike be, and the same hereby is, denied; and it is further ordered that plaintiff answer said affirmative defense on or before fifteen (15) days from the date hereof.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moviecolor Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co.
24 F.R.D. 325 (S.D. New York, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 F.R.D. 100, 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mosher-v-snyder-swanson-inc-pawd-1948.