Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Mosher v. Osborne

Mosher v. Osborne

55 A.D.2d 842, 390 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15660
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 17, 1976
StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.2d 842 (Mosher v. Osborne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mosher v. Osborne, 55 A.D.2d 842, 390 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15660 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The sole question on this appeal is the adequacy of the jury’s verdict in this personal injury action. There was a wide difference of opinion as to the extent of plaintiffs injuries and the extent to which they would be disabling in the future. Accepting the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, as we must, the verdict is not unconscionable and should not be set aside (Mansfield v Graff, 47 AD2d 581, 582). (Appeal from judgment of Erie Supreme Court—automobile negligence.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Cardamone, Simons and Mahoney, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mansfield v. Graff
47 A.D.2d 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A.D.2d 842, 390 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mosher-v-osborne-nyappdiv-1976.