Mosher v. Lustick

Supreme Court of Colorado

Mosher v. Lustick

66 Colo. 455

Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided April 15, 1919·No. No. 9517·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Denison.

The defendant in error moves to strike the bill of exceptions, on the ground that it was not filed in time. It was filed within an extension of time, but there was no notice of motion for extension. The motion to strike must be granted.

In re Luthe’s Will, Ransom v. Holland,, No. 9546, decided herewith. 66 Colo. 420.

Motion to strike bill of exceptions granted.

Garrigues, C. J., and Scott, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Denison.

The defendant in error moves to strike the bill of exceptions, on the ground that it was not filed in time. It was filed within an extension of time, but there was no notice of motion for extension. The motion to strike must be granted.

In re Luthe’s Will, Ransom v. Holland,, No. 9546, decided herewith. 66 Colo. 420.

Motion to strike bill of exceptions granted.

Garrigues, C. J., and Scott, J., concur.

Mosher v. Lustick, 66 Colo. 455 (Colo. 1919).

Pincite

66 Colo. 455 (Mosher v. Lustick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related